The Problem is . . . our Father record! name duality trap

---

Maker's reality has been counterfeit! The real man (lawful) is now presumed to be the created fictitious business  record name, a doppelganger ( juridical /legal )  of the  living being  because  one there has not expressed his/her living will to take control and correct  the presumed dead status on the  domicile record. which records us  as in either the book of Life or the Book of death .

These records are stored and administered by a  public corporation  as the  "hired"  keeper (administrator ) of the public ( for the many)   records for the elect and the elects elected officials who farmed out the recording job to a private  company  forming  a re-public. 

 A republic  is a remade public or the public notice records  being held  by private corporation and controlled  under private access rules ,  the records held  in the trust of a private label  recording company who sells  rights to use them for a profit .  

Instead of the way the record system it was designed  to be, as  a non profit  public service  for maintaining of the public records of the private  people  guarded  by public servants desiring to serve their community for a time and serving a couple year stint as a public  servant of the people protecting  the general public records for future generations. This volunteer system in turn protected the records for future generations from  the private  pirates who saw easy money by controlling that  public information and selling it for a profit as it turned out today.

The real man  has not yet come to the comprehension  of the cedent . The cedent  is the opposite of the decedent , decedent  does not mean dead like we have been  taught to believe . Cedent means to assign or transfer,  so decedent means to not assign or not transferred.  So transfer from what ?  

When we  were  infants our orginal record of birth with our calling ( given name) recorded with the county goverment for proof of our nationality ( nation means people) But then it  was re-recorded or  "registered"  by  the hospital  with the local  health  agency corporation and we were presumed  our record trustees and we were a certificate of that  orginal record called a certificate of live birth and given  us in exchange a life  estate (as interest in our birthright given us by our true father in heaven) where they then controlled our maker given  birthright  as a  property record and us having no access to our orginal birth record  except by paying them to see a copy .

This happened because our biological father did not claim the birth record at the hospital  so when the notice came out in the newspaper of our birth and no one again claimed it  our birthright estate was considered abandoned .  So  since no one sought to transfer  that presumed abandoned property  back we were considered infant de-cedents, ( non transferred entity or ID entity ) . A  record was set up in  NAME similar to our calling , and held in trust under controll of a trustee until we returned to claim it  The certificate of live birth  is that proof or receipt of that property  being held in trust. 

The record  wasn't set up in our given name  as that was us the baby ,  no, it was set up  for us  as a sole proprietor business name  or fictitious  legal NAME  in this format  FIRST MIDDLE LAST. 

Our baby name  was written first -middle: so they could be distinguished  from one another.  But as time went on , we grew up and had to enter school  and since school  was public (for the many )   they used the public registered business name  to enroll us in school instead of our proper given name. This is where the confusion started  as now we had two names  a given  name  and a sole proprietor business name  that had a last name ( dead fiction)  attached  to our given name. The calling  we were called at home by our mother was our first-middle , and at public school  identified by an all caps LASTNAME.  

When we turned 21 years old,  called age of majority,  we were of legal age to act on our own accord  and return the trust abstract birth certificate / business name  to the issuer and claim  back our birthright being held for us.  At this point we could chose  to return to our true heavenly father and leave our adopted city or municipal  father where  we had been adopted  by legal registration , we were now to be responsible for ourselves and set up our own church goverment/society  ONE PROBLEM.  No one told us ! 

 “We must therefore revert to Roman law, which established domicile as the extension or communication of a pre-existent legal status of individuals-origin (origo o, jus originis ). In the theory of the Roman lawyers each man belongs to his municipality, to his city, where, as he contributes his share to the expenses and taxes, so he has a right to the common advantages. Children naturally follow their father's condition and belong likewise to the city, even though born at a distance. Such is the Roman origo, quite akin to what we call nationality, except that the origo relates to the restricted locality of one's birth, and nationality to one's native land. Hence it is birth, the legal birthplace, that determines one's origo,i.e not the actual site of birth but the place where each one should have been born, the municipality to which the father belonged (L. 1. ff. Ad municip.). Let us now suppose a man settled for a long time in a city of which he is not a native. Partly in return for the taxes he pays, and partly to permit him to exercise local civic duties, he is granted the status of a real citizen, without loss, however, of his own origo or municipal right"

Quote from:  www.studylight.org/encyclopedias/tce/d/domicile.html

So in ignorance we kept using our business identity NAME (the  id  or infant decedent entity record )  also known as a sole proprietor  and used that name  to get a drivers license  and social security  etc . all the things  we were told (mistakenly) we needed to be legal adults, thinking all along  that that business name was us! and not the  separate witnessed  living being record of birth it is.

 Our family never used that last name when they called us as children at home,  but outside the home  every business wanted to know our LAST NAME  which was  really a surname  ( surety name ).  We never knew we were using a fictitious  business record as our name  or that  were supposed to transfer back to our true fathers  house (yahawah)  and use our true given calling, our given name in order to not be presumed,  by  use of that registered record,  to be acting  in the capacity of a  fictitious business name! We  were unknowingly presenting ourselves as the successor trustee representing the sole proprietor record LASTNAME!

This transfer or ceding (cedent) of the sole proprietor name back to the issuer/trustee is how we  release  the claim of right to the  trust estate ( an interest only)  and regain the  full  birthright power (called inherent power)  we had when we were born and then set up our own church goverment.

The  birthright power has been split into two rights by the issueing of a share certificate ,  so the trustee or city father ( by the split right )  now had the right of property or legal title and we were relegated  to a use of  or the right of possession or use of the now titled body.  This was done so they  ( the city father ) could access our interest ( by an owner right)  in the birthright estate given us by our heavenly  father (everything maker made, was given for us to use as his spirit children , for our faith in him as our true father) to pay for their management fees  of our account  we supposely abadoned for our public schooling  and all the expenses  we needed as, after all they were acting as our adopted father, or so they say  and controlling our birthright  until we reached the age of majority or woke up  to being  only adopted by the state municipalities. 

But when we turned 21 , they as  trustee de son torts  ( not true executers) must have gotten greedy, taking all those fees for managing our estate because they never told us when we reached the age of majority  that we could do it ourselves as the executer   of our own heavenly father  given interest ( first estate) instead presuming us lost , absentee or dead when we did not return to claim our interest. (second estate)

So now that we have found out,  we have to separate from the  NAME account and correct the records back to their proper place and return to our true maker ,our heavenly father , and straighten out the confusing mess after doing it wrong all these years.

Our true heavenly father who made us  ( not our bio dad )  the maker of our soul ,  is waiting for us to return to him  but  we need to know  first that it wasnt him who gave us the adopted business LEGAL NAME  tied to our adopted city father.  

We need to come back to him in our Christian  or "given name" and  learn who or who's we really are., so he can see and accept us as his,  and settle all our debts created and charged by our adopted city father looking after us ,while we were incompentent minors and give back  all that's his  so we can have clean hands when we come back before  our heavenly  father and he can give us what he has for us  to replace the trust property we won't have  right to anymore as no longer a member of their civil  society.

See our adopted goverment father owned as trustee everything we had, working as a trustee for the man king,  and he could only grant a use to that trust property out to his domiciled  sons and daughters loyal to him, not those who wanted to leave  him  and to return to their real heavenly  father. 

So we return with nothing  to heavenly father, but lucky for us our heavenly father made the entire earth and  owns everything in it!  All we have to do is believe him, return from our lost state and separate from our old ways and NAME ( called being born again) and take on our new calling as a son or daughter  of Yahawah.

Until one establishes  ones own government One can  separate  the two undisguisable names  by filing out a fictious business name  filing with  the domicile, the  business name FIRST MIDDLE LAST  being the fictitious sole proprietor name and the Christian name  First-Middle  being the user of the fictious business name.   However it does not separate  you from that system just righty divides the account  name from the living being , but since  the fiction cannot see living beings it  separates you as the trustee of the record in thier view.

Each business record is an interest or "estate" and considered a vessel ( a container Ship ).  Ships need  captains! The ship cannot pilot itself.  So even though one there has  never set up an actual  business, you are presumed to be one just by using  the dba  legal name (FIRST MIDDLE LAST)  of  the registered berth (birth)  name record and operating ( taking control ) the presumed sole proprietor-ship in that NAME.  So  that presumption must be counter deeded back.

The  double personality that has been formed to run things is called an indivi-dual ( dual personality)  the living being ( in a private   capacity) and the sole proprietorship "record/office " in the public group trust capacity as the captain over that sole proprietor SHIP ( a ship  means  a right like for example  a guardian ship  ids the right of being the guardain)

The NAME  record being the connection betwee the two or individual, as your name/calling  in your private  capacity is indistinguishable from your public OFFICE NAME record  as the presumed public sole proprietor which you are always presumed to be after public registration with whatever  state or city group  when out in the public.

So one man with two persons!  or sides. The private living being using  the record  name of the  public  legal person . This continues until the real living being  wakes up  and  reconnects with his maker in heaven and realizes he has both a soul and a body and has mistakenly given away  his  inherit  power for a set of registered rights (privilege's) or USE of his birthright in exchange for public benefits . 

This realization of the mistake when expressed through outward  expression (speaking the truth by  and on the record  by counterdeed to counter the presumption)  unifies  the two rights  into ONE again  by  clarification and correction of the ship's (trust) records. 

The awake soul is much like  the moment you realize you are an adult and no longer a child. You realize you now have duties and responsibilities,  and a purpose for your life given to you by your maker to fulfill before you die and ascend  to the next stage.  Some people never wake up to this fact of life and remain in the matrix  illusion lie that you are forever to be ruled by men due to the mistake of making a record in their system  and accepting  the office benefits  in trade for your birthrights. When the truth is, that you  are a powerful living spirit being,  loved by your maker Yahawah , who is waiting for you to accept  his love and forgiveness  and removing  your false  re-cords, cut all  ties to the legal name  and come home from your wayward residency  within the Man king world ( 1 st Samuel chapter 8)  and  domicle your soul  with him in the heavenly Kingdom realm.

This legal person (record) the  sole proprietor business entity  is just  a legal record or image reflection of a man created by men , not by Yahawah , by  the application for a certificate of live birth an legal office /business person record is created  , which most people are blinded to  believe is the birth of themselves , however in reality it is just the creation of the legal name  office account "record" that our mother's  asked to be set up by making the application for a certificate of birth in a false belief it was beneficial for  her child.  In truth her  baby was to be recorded in the family bible  record pages. 

A living being  does not need a piece of paper to prove they are living,  but a legal name  record does need to prove exsistence. So the birth certificate  is proof a "organization was organized" and a business name record was created in the system  for us to USE. "Keyword USE."  Much  like  a bank account , of course the bank account itself  isn't you, but  account number ties to a name as the account record name.  So it  is with the name you USE to find  the account  by matching  the account record  name with  the actual account number.

Real people as living beings  are not Individuals,  they are not  account records, they BACK  the  account records! Real people are not plural "You's" or duals.  These created legal record Individuals are the divided ( two lives) persons , business accounts which have personal and business sides for private and public business dealings.  

In fact  free living men have only one name In law!  No man can have more than one Christian name in law ; 1 Ld. Raym. 562; ie John-henry:   First-middle

The living  being  lives in the private  under the laws of "his" maker Yahawah in Heaven, the maker of heaven and earth.  If your spirit (ghost) has not reconnected  with your maker you  are only a shell or sole body , a ghost ship  dead in the water without a captain  or purpose .  Free to be occupied  by anyone and commandeered by the first claimant, as an abandoned record .

Fictions or records  have a last name (truly an occupation name ) attached to the given  first middle name  to create the  private  group  sole proprietor name as a  FIRST MIDDLE LAST like   JOHN HENRY CARPENTER

The Carpenter or trade name ( his trade or work) shows  the man has  been captured  and his given name has  been  attached to a TRADENAME operating in commerce so he is " presumed " ( on the record)  to be acting as the  fiction entity record  in the role of  sole proprietor as a carpenter.

When a given name (Christian calling ) has a last or dead trade name attached to it by a private deed, the name ceases to be a public name  as it now has a private  occupation (Last name ) attached to it changing the name so as to be in a re-public a registered public entity controlled by a private  contract  or member of a group they joined  (joinder) .        

                               Quoting and relying on

JURISPRUDENCE OR THE THEORY OF LAW 

by John Salmond Third Edition.

§ 114. DOUBLE PERSONALITY. 

It often happens that a single human being possesses a double personality. He is one man, but two persons. Unus homo, it is said, plures personas sustinct. In one capacity, or in one right as English lawyers say, he may have legal relationship with himself, or owe money to himself, or transfer property to himself. Every contract, debt, obligation, or assignment requires two persons; but these persons may be the same human being. The double personality exists chiefly in the case of trusteeship. A trustee is, as we have seen, a person in whom the property of another is nominally vested, to the extent that he may represent that other in the management and protection of it. A trustee, therefore, is for many purposes two persons in the eyes of the law. In right of his beneficiary he is one person, and in his own right he is another. In the one capacity he may owe money to himself in the other. In one capacity he may own an encumbrance over property which belongs to himself in the other. He may be his own creditor, or his creditors as his executor, or a testator appoints one of his creditors as his executor, or makes one of his tenants the trustee of his land. In all such cases, were it not for the recognition of double personality, the obligation or encumbrance would be destroyed by merger, or confusio as the Romans call it, for two persons at least are requisite for the existence of a legal relation. No man can in his own right be under any obligation to himself, or own any encumbrance over his own property. Nulli res sua servit.        

Who “you” are, is no longer the question. The question is, who “IS” you. The word “you”

gets more people into trouble than any other word currently utilized within our legal and

financial systems.

It is virtually impossible to fully explain the proper grammatical usage of the word “you”,

insofar as proper English is concerned.

Wikipedia: You (stressed /ˈjuː/; unstressed /jə/) is the second-person personal pronoun in

Modern English. Ye was the original nominative form; the oblique/objective form is you

(functioning originally as both accusative and dative), and the possessive is your or

yours.

YourDictionary.com: you (yo̅ ̵o̅) pronoun pl. you

1. the person to whom one is speaking or writing: personal pronoun in the second

person (sing. & pl.): you is the nominative and objective form (sing. & pl.), yours the

possessive (sing. & pl.), and yourself (sing.) and yourselves (pl.) the reflexive and

intensive; your is the possessive pronominal adjective

2. any person: equivalent in sense to indefinite one: you can never be sure!

Note: Though you is properly a plural, it is in all ordinary discourse used also in

addressing a single person, yet properly always with a plural verb. (No confusion here!)

Loosely, the word “you” is a pronoun, that cannot be properly grammatically used

according to English language rules. When spoken, “you” is commonly heard by

everyone present, as if it were being addressed to each of them, individually, in a singular

sense. We erroneously hear a singular inclination of the properly plural expression, as in

one speaking to a group and saying; “I’m happy to share this with you.”

Properly, “you” is indeed “plural”, yet the word “you” is often spoken as if it were in

reference to a singular man or woman. In such instances, the word “you” induces a

natural inclination for everyone in an audience to hear it as being addressed singularly to

a specific individual within that audience, particularly if the word “you” follows an

antecedent noun; as in one speaking to that same group, and saying; “Yes George, I’m

happy to share this with you.”

In “law”, this word “you”, is properly utilized in all ordinary legal discourse when

addressing the singular mind (or the single party with volition) within the plural-natureconstruct

of a PERSON. The PERSON being comprised of a man that answers for, or is

liable for that PERSON, and the corporate entity that IS that PERSON. In this sense,

addressing a PERSON, as “you”, is actually as close to a proper use of the word “you”,

as anyone could imagine.

Thus the personal pronoun “you”, being both singular and plural, properly addresses the

essential plural nature of the single PERSON entity. The key to benefiting from this, is to

grasp who the correct (plural) components are within that single PERSON entity.

So here are some thought provoking examples:

A judge might say; “Mr. John Smith, I find “you” guilty.” The question arises, then; “who”

is this particular “you”, considering “you” is plural?

The answer may well be in the judge’s next question; “Mr. Smith, do “you” have anything

to say?” Notice, the judge is not properly asking if Mr. John Smith has anything to say, he

is rather improperly asking John Smith, if “you” has anything to say. Thus, whoever

answers, voluntarily defines himself as being in joinder with “you”, and concurrently

accepts the guilty verdict, for the PERSON, Mr. Smith.

Check out any court transcripts you can find, and in not one instance, will you ever find

an example of a judge saying; “I find you, Mr. John Smith, guilty.”

Likewise, find someone high up in the banking system that alleges that “you” owe their

bank money. You will NEVER get them to say “John Smith owes $XXXX to this bank and

therefore John Smith must pay $XXXX to this bank.” Rather they will only always ever

say something like; “You owe $XXXX to this bank, therefore you must pay $XXXX to this

bank.” Even a judge’s order will say something like; “John Smith, I order “you” to pay”.

Even when asked directly to just repeat, “John Smith owes $XXXX to their bank”, they

will either terminate the conversation, or continue to ask; “are you John Smith?”, and

when you respond with “yes”, they repeat that “then you owe $XXX to their bank.” When

asked directly while on a telephone conversation, if they intend to continue to refuse to

say, “John Smith owes $XXXX to their bank”, they generally just get angry and hang up.

I guess we all should be looking for “you”, since “you” is the one, and apparently the only

one, that can be found guilty, or that must pay whatever is owed. Check out collection

notices. Again, it is always “you” that must pay, or action will be taken against “you”.

This is not just silly grammar, and there is good reason to explain it this way. Okay, here

is why. “You”, in legal and financial discourse (which differs from otherwise “normal” language) ,

refers to the duality inherent within, and of, the party that is liable for the essential plural

nature of the single PERSON-corporate-entity, or who at least is prepared to volunteer to

accept responsibility and or liability thereto. The PERSON, a.k.a., the Estate, is at a

minimum, comprised of a decedent, and an Executor, hence the duality/plurality of its

nature, which justifies correctly addressing it with the inherent plurality of the word, “you”.

You see, a PERSON, without its Executor, has no volition, and thus cannot answer to

anyone, judge or banker included. Only a man can answer. The problem arises in that

men are outside, or above the jurisdiction of judges and bankers; i.e., “only a PERSON

may commit an offence”. Hence a judge will not ask a man per se, nor will he ask the

PERSON to answer, he will only ask “you” to answer, in hopes that a man will volunteer

to respond as and for the plural “you” - the PERSON. He also knows very well that he

cannot directly ask the PERSON to answer, because a PERSON is a fiction entity, a.k.a.

corporate being without volition, and cannot answer.

Judges and bankers also know that all PERSONS are domiciled offshore (corporate bodies

registered in foreign jurisdictions), hence they have no domestic jurisdiction over those

PERSONS. Therefore it would be futile to find a PERSON guilty, or to attempt to force a

PERSON to pay a debt, or to pay taxes. Who paid the tax in the Messiah’s day? Well, not

the sons, or the domestic ones, but rather the Strangers and the foreigners. Thus, the

CRA collects the tax, a.k.a., they re-venue it, from a PERSON domiciled in a foreign

jurisdiction so they can comply with scripture.

Hence it is not futile to find a man to volunteer to be “you”, because “you” can indeed, be

found guilty, and “you” can be ordered to pay debts and taxes, and in most cases,

historically at least, “you” has very obediently served the sentences and paid the debts

and the taxes for, and as, the foreign PERSONS. And besides, only a “you”, a.k.a., a

man acting concurrently as a man and as a decedent, within the construct of a PERSON,

can answer a question, or pay a debt or taxes, or cause them to be paid, for, as, or on

behalf of that foreign PERSON.

Many have heard that “sometimes” when a man informs the judge, that the judge has

been appointed as “Trustee”, the judge will dismiss the case, but not always. “You” is

also directly related to the reason for this seemingly inconsistent behavior.

In truth, the PERSON is legally considered an Estate for a “decedent”. This decedent, or

dead man, constitutes the basis, or claim of right to the property of the Estate, a.k.a.,

PERSON. Only an Executor of an Estate can make appointments, such as those of

Trustee or Beneficiary. If a man appoints a judge as the Trustee, then initially, the judge

will correctly presume that you, the man (not “you” the PERSON), has assumed your rightful

role as Executor of the subject Estate. And unless the judge can trick you, the man into

admitting that you, the man is not the Executor, without asking you, the man directly, the

judge will continue on this presumption, and dismiss the case against the plural “you”, the

PERSON.

The judge knows that if you, the man, is the Executor, that you, the man can indeed

appoint him as Trustee, and concurrently hold him liable, as a Trustee. However, if “you”,

the mistaken man, claims to be, or lets himself be tricked by the judge, into being

something like a Grantor, or a Beneficiary, of an undefined, or allegedly undisclosed, or

implied Trust (as opposed to Executor of the subject Estate), then the judge will rapidly find

“you” the PERSON, guilty, because he will then re-place himself as de facto Executor.

Oh, and get over the false and silly idea that it matters, or that the court even cares

whether or not you, the man write the name of the PERSON’s Estate in all capital letters,

a combination of upper and lower case letters, or Chinese symbols.

It DOES NOT MATTER. The PERSON is still defined as an Estate of a decedent,

registered in a foreign jurisdiction, regardless of how you write it’s name. “You” can, and

more importantly you do make joinder with the PERSON’s Estate, regardless of how its

name is written, simply when, and by answering to, “you”.

Inasmuch as I am me, who is “you”?